

Select Excerpts from the Discussion
Track 15
  
 DR LOVE:
 DR LOVE: Ed, how do you approach the choice of an adjuvant chemotherapy 
  regimen?
 DR KIM:  I generally use cisplatin-based therapy. I use cisplatin/docetaxel 60 to 
  70 percent of the time and cisplatin/vinorelbine 30 to 40 percent of the time.
  DR KIM:  I generally use cisplatin-based therapy. I use cisplatin/docetaxel 60 to 
  70 percent of the time and cisplatin/vinorelbine 30 to 40 percent of the time.
 DR LOVE:  Nasser?
  DR LOVE:  Nasser?
 DR HANNA:  I use docetaxel/cisplatin. The logic behind that is docetaxel is 
  a slightly superior drug compared to vinorelbine in the metastatic setting, 
  and vinorelbine is the drug for which we have the most data in the adjuvant 
  setting. I extrapolate that docetaxel will be more effective in the adjuvant setting. However, I have no qualms with colleagues using cisplatin/vinorelbine 
  or other regimens from the trials.
  DR HANNA:  I use docetaxel/cisplatin. The logic behind that is docetaxel is 
  a slightly superior drug compared to vinorelbine in the metastatic setting, 
  and vinorelbine is the drug for which we have the most data in the adjuvant 
  setting. I extrapolate that docetaxel will be more effective in the adjuvant setting. However, I have no qualms with colleagues using cisplatin/vinorelbine 
  or other regimens from the trials.

 
   DR LYNCH:  I agree with Nasser. I answered the question as 90 percent cisplatin/docetaxel and 10 percent cisplatin/gemcitabine. However, if I see a 69-year-old patient six weeks postoperatively with a creatinine level of 1.7 mg/dL 
  who doesn’t look so great, I would likely use carboplatin/paclitaxel.
  DR LYNCH:  I agree with Nasser. I answered the question as 90 percent cisplatin/docetaxel and 10 percent cisplatin/gemcitabine. However, if I see a 69-year-old patient six weeks postoperatively with a creatinine level of 1.7 mg/dL 
  who doesn’t look so great, I would likely use carboplatin/paclitaxel.
Tracks 21-22
  
 DR LOVE:
 DR LOVE: Joan, can you discuss ECOG-E1505, which randomly assigns 
  patients to adjuvant therapy with a cisplatin-based regimen with or 
  without bevacizumab (1.1)?
 DR SCHILLER:  ECOG-E1505 is a Phase III trial for patients with selected 
  Stage IB to IIIA NSCLC, who will be randomly assigned to four cycles 
  of chemotherapy versus four cycles of chemotherapy and up to one year of 
  bevacizumab. To some degree, the chemotherapy will be “dealer’s choice.” 
  The referring physician can choose among cisplatin/gemcitabine, cisplatin/docetaxel and cisplatin/vinorelbine.
  DR SCHILLER:  ECOG-E1505 is a Phase III trial for patients with selected 
  Stage IB to IIIA NSCLC, who will be randomly assigned to four cycles 
  of chemotherapy versus four cycles of chemotherapy and up to one year of 
  bevacizumab. To some degree, the chemotherapy will be “dealer’s choice.” 
  The referring physician can choose among cisplatin/gemcitabine, cisplatin/docetaxel and cisplatin/vinorelbine.

Eligible patients will have Stage IB to IIIA disease, with eligible IB tumors 
  measuring greater than four centimeters in size. The reason for that is based on 
  a subset analysis CALGB conducted of their adjuvant study, in which patients 
  with larger Stage IB tumors were the ones who seemed to benefit (Strauss 
  2006). We’ll apply the typical bevacizumab exclusion criteria. Patients will be 
  allowed to have had squamous cell carcinoma, however, because the disease 
  will be removed. It is hoped that the histology will not be important if the 
tumor is not there.
 DR GRECO:  I believe the scientific aspects of the study are good, but we see a 
  lot of arbitrary thinking about which adjuvant regimens we should use. People 
  have strong feelings about cisplatin, and although I prefer to be more lenient 
  with the type of chemotherapy allowed, many purists are designing the studies.
  DR GRECO:  I believe the scientific aspects of the study are good, but we see a 
  lot of arbitrary thinking about which adjuvant regimens we should use. People 
  have strong feelings about cisplatin, and although I prefer to be more lenient 
  with the type of chemotherapy allowed, many purists are designing the studies.
 DR SANDLER:  : I agree. The study was originally for all patients with Stage IB to 
  IIIA disease. Then the CALGB update reported on this 4-cm concept, and the 
  NCI was adamant that we use the 4-cm cutoff. So we’re using the 4-cm cutoff 
  based on retrospective data from the CALGB-9633 study, which used paclitaxel/carboplatin (Strauss 2006), but they won’t allow paclitaxel/carboplatin in the 
  E1505 study, which has been the only regimen to report survival data with 
  bevacizumab (Sandler 2006).
  DR SANDLER:  : I agree. The study was originally for all patients with Stage IB to 
  IIIA disease. Then the CALGB update reported on this 4-cm concept, and the 
  NCI was adamant that we use the 4-cm cutoff. So we’re using the 4-cm cutoff 
  based on retrospective data from the CALGB-9633 study, which used paclitaxel/carboplatin (Strauss 2006), but they won’t allow paclitaxel/carboplatin in the 
  E1505 study, which has been the only regimen to report survival data with 
  bevacizumab (Sandler 2006).

 DR SOCINSKI:   I believe patients will balk not at the randomization between 
  chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab but at receiving bevacizumab for a 
  year. I speak with a lot of patients about adjuvant therapy — it usually is three or 
  four cycles, and then they’re done. Now you have the patient who is postthoracotomy 
thinking about treatment that is either nine weeks or 12 months.
  DR SOCINSKI:   I believe patients will balk not at the randomization between 
  chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab but at receiving bevacizumab for a 
  year. I speak with a lot of patients about adjuvant therapy — it usually is three or 
  four cycles, and then they’re done. Now you have the patient who is postthoracotomy 
thinking about treatment that is either nine weeks or 12 months.
Track 51
 DR LOVE:
 DR LOVE: Tom, our faculty has treated patients between 70 and 83 years 
  of age with adjuvant chemotherapy. What are your thoughts?
 DR LYNCH:  I believe that is a reasonable range. I don’t believe it’s wrong if 
  you have an 83-year-old woman without other medical problems. It’s difficult 
  to imagine she has lung cancer with no other medical problems, but if that’s 
  the case, it’s reasonable to treat someone regardless of age. The catch is that 
  there are very few patients who fit this description exactly. In general, we do 
  consider age as a factor. Early eighties is probably as high as one should go.
  DR LYNCH:  I believe that is a reasonable range. I don’t believe it’s wrong if 
  you have an 83-year-old woman without other medical problems. It’s difficult 
  to imagine she has lung cancer with no other medical problems, but if that’s 
  the case, it’s reasonable to treat someone regardless of age. The catch is that 
  there are very few patients who fit this description exactly. In general, we do 
  consider age as a factor. Early eighties is probably as high as one should go.
 DR SOCINSKI:   When you use adjuvant therapy in older patients, what are you 
  using? My practice has been to use cisplatin for all patients when I can, but 
  we know cisplatin is a more toxic drug in the elderly. I was the one who used 
  adjuvant therapy in the 83-year-old, and I used carboplatin/paclitaxel.
  DR SOCINSKI:   When you use adjuvant therapy in older patients, what are you 
  using? My practice has been to use cisplatin for all patients when I can, but 
  we know cisplatin is a more toxic drug in the elderly. I was the one who used 
  adjuvant therapy in the 83-year-old, and I used carboplatin/paclitaxel.
Select Publications